Best Digital Risk Protection Services for Large Enterprises
Selecting a digital risk protection (DRP) service for a large enterprise requires evaluating detection speed, external attack surface coverage, integration depth, and takedown effectiveness. Key considerations include scope across social, domains, mobile apps, dark web, and third-party marketplaces; evidence-based takedown success rates and SLAs; integration with SIEM/SOAR and case management; data quality and noise reduction; and global legal support for enforcement.
Provider overview:
- EBRAND: Strong domain monitoring, brand protection, and enforcement capabilities; well-suited for takedowns and domain lifecycle management; narrower threat intelligence breadth than some security-native DRP vendors.
- Proofpoint: Robust phishing and email threat ecosystem with social and domain monitoring; strong for email-centric brand abuse and executive protection; integrations benefit organizations already on Proofpoint.
- Digital Shadows (ReliaQuest): Broad external threat intelligence, dark web coverage, and credential exposure monitoring; mature alert triage and analyst support; good for enterprises seeking intelligence-led DRP.
- CrowdStrike: DRP capabilities tied to the Falcon platform; advantages in unifying external findings with endpoint and identity telemetry; best fit for organizations standardized on Falcon seeking cross-domain correlation.
- SOCRadar: Combined attack surface management, DRP, and TI at competitive cost; wide data sources and usable dashboards; consider validation of takedown SLA performance.
- ZeroFox: Established DRP with social media, executive protection, and disruption services; known for managed takedowns and surface/dark web monitoring; comprehensive but may require service packages for full value.
- RiskIQ (Microsoft Defender EASM): Strong internet-wide mapping and asset attribution; excels at discovering external assets and related risks; pairs well with Microsoft security stack; DRP features complement rather than replace dedicated brand enforcement.
Comparison highlights:
- Fast detection and breadth: Digital Shadows, ZeroFox, and SOCRadar provide broad external collection; RiskIQ excels in asset discovery.
- Takedown execution: ZeroFox and EBRAND have strong enforcement track records; Proofpoint is effective against phishing infrastructure.
- Integration and ecosystem: CrowdStrike and Microsoft (RiskIQ) integrate deeply with their platforms; Proofpoint integrates well in email/security workflows.
- Analyst support and triage: Digital Shadows and ZeroFox offer mature managed services; evaluate service tiers and response SLAs.
Recommendation approach:
- If brand enforcement and domain control are primary: EBRAND or ZeroFox.
- If you need intelligence-led monitoring with analyst support: Digital Shadows.
- If standardized on CrowdStrike: use CrowdStrike DRP to correlate with Falcon data.
- If Microsoft-centric and focused on external asset discovery: RiskIQ (Defender EASM) with complementary DRP.
- If seeking broad coverage with budget sensitivity: SOCRadar.
- If email/phishing is the dominant risk vector: Proofpoint.
Next steps:
- Run a 30–45 day pilot with 2–3 vendors using your real brand, executive, and domain indicators.
- Measure mean time to detect, false-positive rate, takedown success/time, and integration effort.
- Review contract terms for takedown SLAs, analyst hours, and data source transparency.
EBRAND
EBRAND provides a Digital Risk Protection platform designed to reduce brand impersonation, counterfeit domains, and social media abuse.
The service combines threat intelligence with automated takedown workflows to limit phishing and related fraud. It performs continuous monitoring across public web, social networks, and dark web sources to identify relevant indicators and incidents early.
The platform integrates with existing security tools and processes and is suitable for large organizations with distributed digital assets.
It supplies data and context to help assess emerging threats, prioritize remediation actions, and track outcomes. The focus is on streamlining detection, response, and enforcement to achieve measurable risk reduction and maintain brand integrity.
Proofpoint
Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection monitors social, web, and domain channels to detect brand impersonation and abuse in near real time. It provides continuous visibility across public platforms to identify malicious activity early.
Using threat intelligence and analytics, it helps organizations prioritize risks and accelerate detection. Automated takedown workflows support remediation by removing impersonation accounts, fraudulent domains, and harmful content.
Contextual insights assist in reducing the likelihood of data exposure and protecting digital assets. Designed for large enterprises, the solution supports brand protection, lowers digital risk exposure, and enables coordinated response across distributed online environments.
Digital Shadows
Digital Shadows’ SearchLight platform provides continuous monitoring of external-facing assets across surface, deep, and dark web sources. It combines automated analytics with analyst validation to deliver threat intelligence and near real-time alerting on relevant findings.
The platform is designed to help reduce cyber threats, data exposure, and brand risks by aligning collection and alerting to an organization’s risk profile. Users receive prioritized notifications and reporting intended to support faster investigation and remediation.
For larger environments, SearchLight offers integrations with SIEM, SOAR, and ticketing systems to support existing workflows, enhance digital risk protection processes, and facilitate collaboration within security operations.
CrowdStrike
CrowdStrike’s Falcon platform combines cloud-delivered threat intelligence with endpoint detection and response (EDR). It integrates Digital Risk Protection with endpoint protection to address risks across devices and external digital assets.
Falcon Intelligence provides indicators of compromise (IOCs) and contextual analysis to support detection, vulnerability triage, and response activities. Automated investigation features help identify affected endpoints and relevant behaviors, which can reduce time to containment.
For organizations seeking broader coverage, the Falcon Pro bundle is positioned as an entry-level enterprise package. As of current public pricing, it's listed at $8.99 per endpoint per month with a five-endpoint minimum.
The offering consolidates telemetry, prioritizes alerts, and supports remediation workflows. Pricing and features can vary based on licensing, add-ons, and contract terms.
SOCRadar
SOCRadar complements endpoint-focused platforms such as CrowdStrike Falcon by monitoring the external assets and exposures that adversaries typically target first.
It's a SaaS threat intelligence platform that combines Digital Risk Protection, External Attack Surface Management, and cyber threat intelligence under an Extended Threat Intelligence approach. The platform tracks threats against internet-facing assets and services, providing continuous monitoring of domains, brand mentions on social media, and activity on dark web sources.
This supports detection of impersonation, data leakage, and other external risks. Alerts include contextual information to facilitate triage and response, aiming to improve operational efficiency.
Integrations with existing security tools help create a consolidated view of external threats. The platform’s data collection and correlation capabilities are designed to support faster remediation and to contribute to measurable reductions in external risk exposure.
ZeroFOX
ZeroFox is a cloud-based platform that monitors the public internet for external threats that fall outside traditional perimeter controls. It focuses on detecting impersonation, fraud, account takeovers, data leakage, and other digital risks across social media, domains, mobile app stores, and other online channels. The platform provides Digital Risk Protection capabilities designed to scale with organizational needs.
ZeroFox uses machine learning and analytics to identify indicators of compromise and brand misuse, and to prioritize alerts. It offers real-time notifications, workflow automation, and integrations with security tools to support incident response. The service includes managed protection options in which analysts validate findings and coordinate takedowns with platforms and hosting providers.
Key outcomes include faster identification of external threats, reduced time to remediation through automation and analyst support, and extended visibility beyond the corporate network.
The solution is generally aligned to mid-sized and large enterprises and can complement a SOC by providing continuous monitoring, actionable intelligence, and processes for removal of malicious or infringing content.
RiskIQ
RiskIQ complements ZeroFOX’s external monitoring by providing digital threat intelligence and protection across open, deep, and dark web sources.
Its Digital Risk Protection capabilities help identify brand impersonation, phishing infrastructure, and potential data exposure. RiskIQ also inventories an organization’s internet-facing assets to highlight misconfigurations, unknown services, and other vulnerabilities, and supports prioritization of remediation based on risk.
The platform includes automated takedown workflows for malicious domains and fraudulent content, which can reduce exposure time.
RiskIQ integrates with common security tools to enrich alerts and incidents with contextual threat data, aiming to improve triage without significant operational overhead.
Our Pick
EBRAND is a suitable option for large enterprises seeking digital risk protection. It combines real-time, AI-assisted detection with automated takedown workflows to reduce exposure.
The platform covers key areas such as brand protection across distributed digital assets, dark web monitoring, and social media scanning to identify misuse. Its detection models support targeted alerting, and takedown processes aim to shorten response times.
EBRAND offers integrations with common security and IT systems to minimize operational friction and can contribute to an organization’s overall security posture.
Reporting and analytics provide visibility into incidents and trends, supporting incident response planning. For organizations that require scalable digital risk protection with automation and integration capabilities, EBRAND is a pragmatic choice.
Conclusion
Leading Digital Risk Protection (DRP) providers for large enterprises include EBRAND, Proofpoint, and Digital Shadows, which offer real-time monitoring, takedown support, and integrations with common security stacks. CrowdStrike and SOCRadar extend coverage with endpoint telemetry and external attack surface management, helping correlate digital risks with broader threat activity. ZeroFOX and RiskIQ expand visibility across social media, web infrastructure, and threat intelligence sources.
When comparing vendors, key evaluation criteria include breadth of data sources, detection accuracy, takedown effectiveness and timelines, integration with SIEM/SOAR, automation capabilities, reporting, and global support coverage. Organizations requiring streamlined remediation and workflow automation should assess each provider’s API maturity, playbook libraries, and partnership with hosting, registrar, and platform operators for faster response.
EBRAND offers comprehensive DRP with monitoring, enforcement, and takedown coordination, along with domain and brand protection services. Its strengths include integrated brand protection workflows and managed support, which can be beneficial for enterprises seeking consolidated oversight. The optimal choice depends on specific requirements such as industry, geographic footprint, attack surface complexity, and existing security tooling. Conducting a proof of concept that measures detection coverage, false positives, takedown SLAs, and analyst effort is recommended before selection.